Sorry, But I Don’t Feel Empathy For These Muslims

President Trump has been one busy man this week just handing everybody who is basically not a straight white male that work.  He’s got millions of white women pissed off, Latinos pissed off, LGBT community pissed off, Native Americans pissed off, Muslims pissed off, other countries around the world pissed off…dude has been getting busy within just the first week of his Presidency.  Seriously, this was LITERALLY just his first week on the job.  Imagine how the remainder of his Presidency shall proceed.

With all of that taking place, I got to admit, I’m seriously struggling over here to figure out how in the world I can come up with 1 single fuck to give to show empathy & support for all of these people he’s royally pissed off.  I’m seriously struggling over here.  The reason why I’m struggling so hard is because there are simply way too many brutalized and/or dead black bodies unjustly harmed/killed due to the hands of the police where no justice whatsoever has come forth that are preventing me from giving a damn about all of these other groups of people.  I’m just being real with you.  How many black bodies have we witnessed being brutalized or killed on film just within the last 6 years or so by the police where no justice was brought forth?  How many people that are highly upset with Trump were not showing black society any love when we hit the streets to declare Black Lives Matter?  How many of these people Trump has pissed off were declaring Colin Kaepernick a traitor for taking a knee during the playing of the national anthem JUST A FEW MONTHS AGO?  How many of these people ever really gave a damn about the cries of black society when we were yelling at the top of our damn lungs that black people are STILL treated like shit in this country?  But now that The Donald has stepped in to let the rest of these people know that they can get that work too, now it’s a problem.  Now I’m supposed to show empathy & support when none of that empathy & support has ever been reciprocated.  I guess that’s the game we’re supposed to be playing now.  Nah B.  The game that needs to be played is…hold your own nuts.

I mean, let’s just keep it real here.  As long as that bitch that is responsible for the death of Emmett Till is still alive living the rest of her life out free of any justice being sought against her, then why should anybody from black society give a damn about what all of these other people are going through?  I mean at the end of the day, be glad you’re not black.

Your favorite mulatto.


  1. Rich Ccny

    January 29, 2017 at 9:49 am

    hey, you may wanna look at the people who were marching in the black lives matter protests. They weren’t all black. People from all different walks of life protested for what they thought was bullshit. Go back and look at the faces in any of those crowds. There is a lot of support there. White liberals and SJW’s drool at opportunities like this. And Kapernick had his supporters although he really chose the wrong forum to express his views.

    And mull this over, Kapernick is a multi-million dollar athlete who didn’t like the rash of police shootings of black men. Fine. So what does he do? He kneels during the nation anthem? Aaand how does that help exactly? This cheap motherfucker should have donated some of his millions to help fix/address the problem. Maybe help pay for the funerals of some of these men whose family may be hard up for cash.

    Nah, none of that. He’ll just take a knee. What a crusader he is (slow clap).

    • Wookin Panub

      January 30, 2017 at 10:03 am

      Quote: “White liberals and SJW’s drool at opportunities like this” EXACTLY!! White liberals don’t give a damn about blacks. They only care about their system, their philosophy, which in turn they want to believe benefits blacks etc…but in reality, it doesn’t. White liberals just use blacks to further their own agenda, but heh! Keep screaming, black lives matter while white liberals keep trotting you to abortion clinics to kill more of our black babies (population control)

      • H.T. Smith

        February 7, 2017 at 1:50 am

        Not everybody needs to have kids. This is why im pro choice. Case in point: my own mother. Honestly, she would have been better off not a mother as all shes done is make me and every non moist dude pay for her fathers failings.

        • Wookin Panub

          February 13, 2017 at 10:27 am

          If your mother would have been better off not being a mom, then you would not be here supporting your pro choice argument. If you were truly pro-choice, then you believe that you shouldn’t be here therefore you have nothing to contribute to society, and you shouldn’t be giving me your opinion, since your opinion shouldn’t matter, right?

          • H.T. Smith

            February 18, 2017 at 5:30 pm

            Whatever floats your boat. Im just saying shes a prime example of someone who really need not have kids as all she did was put her hurt from her father on me.

    • jackflash1

      February 6, 2017 at 11:11 am

      The QB’s website,, details the donations Kaepernick made in October and what he plans to do in November. Kaepernick donated $25,000 each in October to four different organizations: Silicon Valley De-Bug in San Jose, Causa Justa in the Bay Area, Urban Underground in Milwaukee and Mothers Against Police Brutality in Dallas. For November, Kaepernick plans to donate $25,000 each to the Black Youth Project in Chicago, The Gathering For Justice and Communities United For Police Reform in New York and the I Will Not Die Young Campaign in Milwaukee.

      Read more at:

  2. Wookin Panub

    January 30, 2017 at 9:45 am

    Trump only has people on the LEFT pissed off, and the left is always pissed, because deep down they are miserable people who want others to also be miserable

    • Kamryn

      January 30, 2017 at 1:31 pm

      Jim Crow was legal too. Never confuse the law with what is right.

      • Wookin Panub

        January 30, 2017 at 3:13 pm

        I didn’t confuse the law with what is right. But since you brought it up. Jim Crow was instated by the Democratic party. You know that party you probably voted for. Jim Crow was not supported nor enforced in Republican states, you know that party you think is racist.

        • Kamryn

          January 30, 2017 at 4:09 pm

          You completely made up what you *think* my beliefs are, then attacked your conjured straw man.

          • Wookin Panub

            January 30, 2017 at 4:19 pm

            I love when people accuse others of using a logical fallacy and not reveal what that fallacy is. First of all, I used the word “probably” to infer that I was assuming. I answered your question, that I don’t confuse laws with morality and used an example. The Jim crow thing that you brought up was just an added bonus. If you had read Trump’s order( which I doubt that you did) It has zero relation with the Jim Crow laws.

        • jackflash1

          February 4, 2017 at 3:21 pm

          That was then..that democratic party you speak of has morphed into the new GOP party since around Nixon’s time. Remember Civil Rights? LBJ? The Dixiecrats, whom you are calling Democrats? It’s very complicated, you seem lost.

          • Wookin Panub

            February 5, 2017 at 11:32 am

            There was no morphing. You would be hard pressed to find even five Dixiecrats that switched to the Republican Party. It is true that southern whites started to become more Republican in the 70’s, but that wasn’t due to racism, instead it was due to the economic prosperity Republican principles brought about. Furthermore, there is a direct correlation in the south with an increase in southern whites becoming Republican, there is a decrease of racism in the South. As a result, blacks from all regions of the U.S. started flocking to the south since the 80’s on; the same racist states they once fled.

  3. Wookin Panub

    January 30, 2017 at 9:53 am

    Trump has only pissed on people on the left. A group who have convinced themselves that they are victims under some sort of apartheid system. Therefore it is very easy to see Trump; a straight, white rich male as a monster. But is what they are seeing a reality or is it projecting their own fears and insecurities.

  4. Wookin Panub

    January 30, 2017 at 10:16 am

    “The reason why I’m struggling so hard is because there are simply way too many brutalized and/or dead black bodies unjustly harmed/killed due to the hands of the police” I believe that last year, the police shot and killed around 125 blacks, the number even higher in shooting of whites by police. 6,000 black men were shot and killed by other black men.

  5. Wookin Panub

    January 30, 2017 at 3:16 pm

    Sorry, I replied to you by accident, but since you asked. I don’t know. I merely said that the only role of government is to protect the rights and safety of its citizens. The question still remains, if Trump is doing just that? if he is, then he is well within his rights as rule of law to do it regardless of what you think.

    • Malcom Flex

      March 16, 2017 at 4:40 am

      Naw sorry not sorry and ask the average American Black most of us feel the same. They/you/yall had no prob letting evil rule when BP where underfoot. Ain’t no fun when the rabbit got the gun. You never miss the Black till we say SEE YA.

  6. jackflash1

    February 6, 2017 at 11:09 am

    Solid South States’ Rights and Tea party-esque Populists and elite Social Liberal Progressives switched parties from roughly 1900 to 2000, which resulted in red and blue states flipping from north to south.There are maps that illustrate this, you can easily find them. To put it another way, the Anti-Federalists became the Democrats and Federalists became the Whigs and then Republicans. The Federalist line was historically anti-immigrant and nationalist, as it is even today, and the anti-federalists were the anti-tax, anti-bank, small government, populist liberals that, for a long time dominated the South. ”Republican is a reference to a Republican form of government, Democrat is a reference to individual focused Democracy.” They are both liberal ideologies. Forget about slavery and segregation for a second, and think about “the people, not the state, choosing who gets to do what”. The original Democrats were more for individual and states’ rights, and the original republicans more for elite state control and order. All the founders were classical liberals in that they weren’t loyal Conservatives of the Crown. Unfortunately, the country seems to have shifted back 200 years or so to a time where Americans seems to want to be Conservatives loyal to the Crown once again. They even invented their own Royal Family. Incredibly, they are just as insane as loony King George was in the founder’s time.

    • Wookin Panub

      February 6, 2017 at 6:02 pm

      I don’t know that the founding fathers were classical liberals, since such terms: liberals, conservatives etc…were not around back then. How Americans eventually divided into liberals and conservatives, and how liberalism and conservatism came to represent distinct political worldviews would require almost a lifetime of research

      • jackflash1

        February 7, 2017 at 2:03 pm

        Go back to school…you have no idea what you are talking about. You’re just trying to justify your talking point with other people’s opinions.It doesn’t ‘require a lifetime of research’, it just requires an open mind to reality unfettered with other’s opinions and based on simple definitions. ”Republican is a reference to a ‘Republican’ form of government, Democrat is a reference to individual focused Democracy.” In a ‘republican’ government, citizens have a lot of power — their vote determines who is running the government. A ‘Democrat’ was a word that originally referred to a republican (strange,eh?) in the French Revolution, or, and this is key, someone who opposed the aristocracy.But they are both liberal ideologies. Break out the books and prove me wrong. Both idea’s were in stark contrast to the British rule of monarchy, the rule of the aristocrats- which was a far cry from the republican/democratic idea’s expressed by Jefferson and Washington as anything an aristocrat like Trump says today.

        • Wookin Panub

          February 13, 2017 at 9:05 am

          Sorry, I have been sick. Trump is not a Republican nor is he a conservative. He is a populist. Now let’s get back to who the democrats really are before we got derailed with etymology. Democrats today are the same as their forefathers; pro slavery, KKK ETC…. Democrats use to argue that blacks were not human therefore did not have any rights so they can do with blacks in how they see fit. Today, democrats use the exact same argument about babies in the womb. Babies are not human, but fetuses therefore have no rights, and we can do with them how we see fit. Democrats have always used forced rights on others, and continue to do it today, which has resulted in 17 million black babies being slaughtered. Have you noticed how Democratic positions always have black people end up with the short end of the stick?

          • jackflash1

            February 13, 2017 at 11:17 pm

            ”Democrats today are the same as their forefathers; pro slavers, KKK ETC?”….don’t be ridiculous. Find me one.

    • Wookin Panub

      February 7, 2017 at 12:25 pm

      I really do not see a difference between the democrats of the past and the democrats of today.

%d bloggers like this: